Performance by health facilities is usually assessed across multiple dimensions

Some of these assessment dimensions include quality of care offered, efficiency in performing specific tasks such as length of hospital stay, efficient use of resources, ability to meet reporting guidelines, among others. Health system structures vary from country to country.

Nevertheless, in most countries, health facilities are categorized according to ownership. The two main categories of ownership often include public and private facilities, with the private facilities further divided into not-for-profit and private forprofit. Each of these categories are distinguished by factors such as operational structures, obligation to pay taxes, incentives, human, infrastructural and financial resources [1] Disposable Aprons.

These different factors within the ownership categories contribute to different impacts on various elements of performance within a health facility [1, 2]. © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 T. Jarm et al. (Eds.): EMBEC 2020, IFMBE Proceedings 80, pp. 38–44, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64610-3_5 However, few studies exist that rigorously evaluate differences in performance, and reviews of performance by facility-type have often led to conflicting conclusions [3, 4] YICHANG Gloves.

The performance of care facilities within low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) at reporting mandated HIV indicators has been of great interest, given the need to stem the AIDS epidemic. In most LMICs, health facilities are required by the Ministries of Health (MoH) to report on various HIV indicators to aid in monitoring and evaluation of HIV programs, advocacy, policy and decision-making.

In general, reported indicators are expected to be timely, accurate and complete. Ownership of health facilities has the potential to affect the performance of health facilities at meeting these HIV reporting requirements, yet rigorous evaluations on relationship between facility type and HIV indicator reporting are limited. With increasing use of nationallevel centralized electronic HIV-indicator data aggregation and reporting systems such as the District Health Information Software 2 (DHIS2), data now exists in several LMICs for these evaluations.

The aim of this study is to establish the relationship of health facility ownership type with ability to meet HIV indicator reporting requirements, using the case study of Kenya. The reporting requirements assessed in this study are completeness and timeliness in facility reporting Vinyl Gloves.